做产品 PMaker
空格的键盘
发现
关注中
1.2w
C 端一个人凭喜好决定用不用
订单管理后台
工作台 订单管理 库存 结算 权限设置
待审批订单
批量通过
单号金额状态
SO-20481¥12,400待审批
SO-20480¥3,880已通过
SO-20479¥27,150已驳回
B 端一个组织按流程决定买不买

同样是产品,判断好坏的标准几乎没有交集。左边看的是有没有人愿意多待一会,右边看的是这套流程跑不跑得通。

Product Types and Directions

There's only one product methodology. Applied to different product types, it often reaches opposite conclusions. Mix up the types, and every method you learn gets aimed at the wrong target.

After reading, you can answer
  • 为什么 C 端讲的「减少一步」,到了 B 端反而要加一步
  • 平台、工具、内容这三种形态,各自最难的地方在哪
  • 你自己想做的东西属于哪一类,该照哪套标准判断

The most common misuse is dropping consumer-playbook moves straight into enterprise. Consumer users can leave at any moment, so every extra step is churn. Enterprise users can't leave—but every step they take sits on top of a real business process and a real line of accountability. Skip a step there, and things break.

Consumer and enterprise

The difference isn't the interface. It's "who decides whether to use it" and "who pays when it's used wrong."

看的是 C 端 B 端
谁做决定用的人自己,一秒钟决定老板买、员工用,两拨人
能不能走随时能走,所以每一步都算流失走不了,所以怕的是出错不是麻烦
判断依据数据。留存、转化、时长流程。跑不跑得通,对不对得上账
功能怎么加能砍就砍,简单是竞争力该有的必须有,缺一个环节就没法交付
最难的地方让人第一次愿意打开把一个组织的现实流程搞清楚
出错的代价用户下次不来了财务对不上账,有人要担责
The overwhelming majority of indie developers land in the tool bucket—not for lack of ambition, but because tools are the only form that can stand on "just building it." For platforms and communities, building it is only the start; the real cost comes after.

Same feature, two sides—the implementations can differ by a single "Confirm" button.

笔记应用
×
已删除 撤销
C 端:删了再说给一次撤销的机会
合同管理
确认作废这份合同?
编号 HT-2024-0391,金额 ¥286,000
作废后会同步给财务和客户,无法恢复
输入合同编号确认
确认作废 取消
B 端:先拦一道不可逆的动作要有代价
The overwhelming majority of indie developers land in the tool bucket—not for lack of ambition, but because tools are the only form that can stand on "just building it." For platforms and communities, building it is only the start; the real cost comes after.

Four forms

Beyond who you serve, there's the question of product form. It decides where your growth comes from and which part is hardest to crack.

形态怎么赚钱最难的地方例子
工具 订阅、买断、增值功能 做完一件事就走,很难留住人 剪辑软件、笔记、设计工具
内容 广告、会员、带货 内容供给要持续,断一天就掉 视频、播客、资讯
平台 抽佣、流量分发 两边都要有人,先有鸡还是先有蛋 电商、外卖、招聘
社区 广告、电商、会员 氛围一旦垮掉基本救不回来 论坛、兴趣社区
The overwhelming majority of indie developers land in the tool bucket—not for lack of ambition, but because tools are the only form that can stand on "just building it." For platforms and communities, building it is only the start; the real cost comes after.

Which one should you build

For one person building with AI, the difficulty gap across these four forms is huge.

一个人能扛 需要一支团队和很多钱 工具 做出来就能用 内容 要持续生产 社区 要有人气才成立 平台 两边都要冷启动
The overwhelming majority of indie developers land in the tool bucket—not for lack of ambition, but because tools are the only form that can stand on "just building it." For platforms and communities, building it is only the start; the real cost comes after.

When picking a direction, ask these three together: are you serving an individual or an organization; is the form a tool, content, platform, or community; and can you carry it alone until the first users show up. When the three answers line up, the direction is basically right.