做产品 PMaker
空格的键盘
一级:付费会员转化率 跟公司目标一致,很难被直接改动 二级:用户增长 二级:用户活跃度 二级:付费行为 分渠道新用户 回访用户数 日活 人均停留时长 分品类付费数 复购率 越往下越具体,也越能被一次改动直接影响

一级指标看方向,三级指标才是你能动手的地方。中间那层负责把两头连起来。

How to build a metrics system

A metrics system is a tree: one number at the top for direction, broken down to the layer a single change can move.

What you will run into
  • 看板上二十个数,不知道该盯哪个
  • 做了个功能,说不清它该让哪个数变好
  • 两个人说的「日活」不是一回事,对不上账

First, pick the top metric

The top metric must match the product goal, and it shifts with the lifecycle. The same product has a different number at the top in different stages.

阶段业务重点一级指标
引入期打磨核心功能,获取第一批用户总用户数、次周留存
成长期激活并留住已有用户活跃度、留存率
成熟期商业变现付费转化、客单价、GMV
衰退期提效降本,找新增长点获客成本、利润、新方向的验证数据
Without a time window there is nothing to compare; without a qualifier you do not know which behavior is being counted. "Daily active" usually does not reconcile because it is poorly defined: does opening the app count, or do they have to tap into content?

One more filter: a metric must be actionable. A number you cannot move with any strategy is not worth watching.

一级指标随生命周期变——同一个产品,不同阶段顶上那个数不一样 引入期 打磨核心功能 总用户数 · 次周留存 成长期 激活并留住已有用户 活跃度 · 留存率 成熟期 商业变现 付费转化 · 客单价 衰退期 提效降本,找新增长 获客成本 · 利润 选一级指标的两条筛子 ① 这个数改善了,是不是意味着产品真的变好了? ② 它必须是可改进的——你影响不了的数,盯着没有意义。 往下拆时要分清过程指标和结果指标:结果(订单数、收入)滞后且很难直接干预, 过程(搜索转化率、优惠券领取率)才是你能动手优化的地方。
Without a time window there is nothing to compare; without a qualifier you do not know which behavior is being counted. "Daily active" usually does not reconcile because it is poorly defined: does opening the app count, or do they have to tap into content?

Break it down

拆法怎么用
按 AARRR 拆获取、激活、留存、收益、推荐,每段设二三级指标。适合看整条链路
按用户流程拆照着用户实际走的步骤逐段设指标。适合定位卡在哪一步
按 OGSM 拆目标、绩效、策略、度量。强调区分过程指标和结果指标
按 OKR 拆目标加关键结果,再把每个关键结果拆成具体指标
Without a time window there is nothing to compare; without a qualifier you do not know which behavior is being counted. "Daily active" usually does not reconcile because it is poorly defined: does opening the app count, or do they have to tap into content?

Define one metric clearly

Ambiguous metrics are the most common source of reconciliation fights on a team. A complete metric has three parts.

近 7 日 + 浏览 + 文章数量
时间周期
修饰词
原子指标
Without a time window there is nothing to compare; without a qualifier you do not know which behavior is being counted. "Daily active" usually does not reconcile because it is poorly defined: does opening the app count, or do they have to tap into content?

Once metrics are set, write them up as a metrics dictionary: name, formula (how it is computed), and constraining dimensions. Everyone on the team checks the same document — that is how you stop everyone quoting different numbers.

A lighter version for solo builders